Rss Feed
Payday loans
  1. Super Lawyers Virginia 2013

    June 26, 2013 by Christy

    Andrew A. Protogyrou was recently listed in the 2013 Super Lawyers Magazine for Personal Injury Defense: General. He was only one of four attorneys in the City of Norfolk in that category and one of sixteen from across the Commonwealth of Virginia. This annual list compiles the nation’s top attorneys nominated by their peers for excellence in practice. This publisher considers the attorneys listed as the go-to attorneys in litigation.


  2. Several teens armed at Norfolk shooting site

    April 10, 2013 by Christy

    Police released more details Monday about the shootings outside a downtown teen concert on Friday. In addition to gunfire that injured two teens, six boys are being charged after police found them with guns.

    The arrests were not connected to the gunshots that injured a male and a female teen, who were walking on Monticello Avenue near East Freemason Street about 10 p.m. when the incident occurred. Both have

    venue. Police Chief said officers working in the area on Friday responded quickly.

    Councilman Andy Protogyrou said he wished city officials held a news conference Monday to explain what happened.

    The criminal defense attorney doesn’t fault The NorVa and said more police might not have stopped the gunfire.

    “I can’t tell you that having an officer standing next to the person would have stopped this,” he said.

    Other council members could not be reached.

    Read the full article here.


  3. REMARKS REGARDING NORFOLK CONFERENCE CENTER

    by Christy

    The following speech was given by Councilman Andrew A. Protogyrou on April 9, 2013.

    As a public official entrusted with your trust and our fiduciary responsibilities, I believe in my requirement to examine each vote, its benefits and liabilities, and support each vote with knowing and intelligent research. Each of us must conduct our own due diligence and examine all angles of this project from points that the citizens in whole, or in part, may not know, consider or be familiar with.

    I appreciate a town hall on such a topic and in no way discount same, nor the opinions for delay. However, weighing same, I find no reason to delay this vote.

    I frankly would never expect a town hall where citizens would show up and proclaim their want for a conference center or any other fiscal project that may not be seen as directly affecting them. I would, however, expect contrarian opinions to express themselves for various other pots and sources of funding more closer to home. I understand, have no problem, and agree with same.

    I do not take this vote or my position on same personally. I will try to objectively examine how I have arrived to same and expect my arrival upon my opinion to business proposal to council for the city to expand their ballroom in lieu of a new conference center. Does the present ownership of this property have room to approach the city and render an opinion in this deal? Their opinion now lacks total credibility and only shows the ownership’s self-serving correspondence for what it was. The Sheraton’s ballroom is almost 50% the size of a new conference center and is a property, over the years, that benefited from city funds and the original Waterside and promenade.

    Lastly, each in this hotel correspondence mentions the effects of sequestration on their properties. I believe near term the economy and sequestration has and will effect their properties.

    However, neither, in their correspondence truly and completely address the long term economy. At this time, construction costs are low as is the price of money. The economic growth, 5, 10, and 20 years into the future is our duty to examine as economic diversification and added jobs to our own municipal economy.

    Fiduciary responsibility is a significant factor in our decision. As I vote today, I have voted against many projects I thought were unfair or could have been supported by the developer’s own funds. (21st St., Chick- Fil- A, YMCA) to name a few. However, the examination of the funds and their sources are different in this project. This is not a new deal. This is a deal a decade old.

    The parking garage, though if I had my druthers would not be in this deal, is an industry requirement. It’s funding as part of the city’s parking bond package does not effect our city’s debt structure, by statute, and becomes a city asset on our balance sheets. The business model has it paid by parking fees. These are not general funds allocated to core municipal functions such as schools, transportation, and public safety.

    In 2003, the city council established the public amenities fund. A decade old revenue source that has raised 56.2 million dollars in 10 years. This fund was specifically earmarked from meals and lodging taxes to promote cultural and entertainment activity and to prepare for new downtown civic facilities. In the bank, right now, is 19.7 million to pay for the 42.5 million dollar conference center. (19.7 million cash for the investment). Keep in mind, however, 5 million is generated annually and with renewed pedestrian traffic at a new conference center, this 5 million annually, would be even more through job creation (250 in the new property), payroll, economic activity, retail sales, and hotel stays. The investment into an asset lasting three (3) or four (4) decades or more similar to any real estate purchase of sorts for any business or personal investment pays itself off.

    Do I have a problem with the city’s “enticement” portion to the developer? Yes. Is this amount a deal breaker? No. Why?

    The 7.5 million dollar grant is money that has been set aside since 2007 by a then council for this purpose. It is not new money and not funds allocated at that time to schools, transportation, and public safety.

    The $750,000 restaurant incentive is to be paid back over 10 years and only if performance is met. If the restaurant generates more faster, it is paid faster and we all benefit faster.

    None of these funds from a decade ago or half a decade ago, before I made it to council were ever earmarked by previous council for schools, public safety, or transportation.

    Can and should we do better? I believe this counsel will. Jobs generated between the conference center and Waterside could range from 750 to 1500 people.

    Lastly, relationships matter. Mr. Thompson and Gold Key are the gold standard in the resort industry. Gold Key is ranked as one of the top 25 vacation ownership companies in the world. Gold Key’s reputation in reservations, hotel and time share ownership only leads to great things for a downtown business, culturally centered property with Gold Key’s reservation system. A property Gold Key currently lacks and wants to be successful.

    I believe I have done my due diligence, considered the foregoing facts, seriously examined this issue from many angles, some known and some unknown to the citizens, and confidently can make my vote in favor of this project.


  4. Statues crumbling at Norfolk Botanical Garden

    April 2, 2013 by Christy

    Phidias has seen better days. Phidias is one of 11 statues at the Norfolk Botanical Garden that have deteriorated over time. The pieces, at the garden since the early 1970s, were created after the Civil War to pay homage to some of history”s greatest artists. They have suffered from prolonged exposure to the region”s humid weather and nearby Norfolk International Airport”s toxic fumes.

    The intricate 7-foot-tall, 1,500-pound

    sculptures are in varying stages And now, almost 18 years to the libra weekly horoscope that he defeated Cochran for Leader, he is appearing ads trying to save Cochran from defeat in next week’s Mississippi primary run-off. of disintegration.

    Rembrandt has been in storage ever since a hurricane knocked out his pedestal years ago. Raphael is missing part of his palette and nose. Italian sculptor Antonio Canova also is missing part of his nose and several fingers. Leonardo da Vinci and Thomas Crawford have suffered similar injuries.

    Local advocates hope to raise about $1.5 million to restore the pieces.

    Patricia Rawls, who serves on the restoration committee, said they”re still trying to figure out how to accomplish this. The money would cover both the repair of the originals and the creation of reproductions to take their places outside.

    She said they hope to have a company selected by next month. Ideally, laser scanning, which would aid in the restoration and serve as an archival record, could be done on site so visitors would be able to watch the conservator, she said.

    That could mean moving the statues indoors from the garden”s popular Statuary Vista and replacing them with reproductions.

    The project has a passionate and powerful ally: The Virginia Military Institute family.

    The statues” creator, Moses Ezekiel, was a prominent VMI alumnus. Ezekiel, a Richmond native, was the first Jewish cadet at VMI and a Confederate soldier who fought in the Battle of New Market.

    His classmates who died in that battle are buried beside a poignant statue he created on the VMI campus titled “Virginia Mourning Her Dead.” A ceremony is held by the statue every year to mark the battle”s anniversary.

    To this day, the piece has the power to stir the emotions of City Councilman Andy Protogyrou, who graduated from VMI in 1984. Protogyrou said the city should play a role in restoring the statues, but he hopes the money will be raised privately.

    The councilman first became aware of the statues as a college student, when he served as an escort in the Azalea Festival, then held at the garden. The festival is now known as the Norfolk NATO Festival, and this year”s parade is being organized – coincidentally – by Ezekiel”s great-great-great-nephew, Alex Pincus.

    Read the full article here.


  5. Norfolk manager seeks state inquiry in alleged bribery

    March 27, 2013 by Christy

    Norfolk City Manager has asked Virginia State Police to investigate the alleged bribery of two city employees.

    The City

    Council was also told he would launch an administrative investigation into internal controls and all agreements.

    The investigation will also look into the approval process and the employees who have the authority to approve transactions.

    The city manager’s decision comes on the heels of a federal investigation into who had not yet been identified.

    Read the full article here.


  6. Norfolk councilman wants more information on bribery case

    March 25, 2013 by Christy

    A councilman said Friday March 22, 2013 that the city should divulge more about the alleged bribery of two employees who are accused of accepting

    Protogyrou said he was told that federal investigators have not disclosed the identities of the employees to the city. Still, Protogyrou, who is an attorney, said that while secrecy is typical for a federal investigation, that”s not an excuse for the silence at City Hall.

    “We still have a duty to stand behind a podium and say what we can say and say what we know,” Protogyrou said. “And I won”t be satisfied until we do that.”

    Read the full article here.


  7. Norfolk trial begins for Somalis who fired on Navy ship

    February 27, 2013 by Christy

    Armed with AK-47s, a group of Somali men in a small skiff opened fire in 2010 on a 609-foot Navy ship off the coast of Africa.

    Prosecutors argue the men were pirates who mistook the amphibious dock landing ship for a commercial vessel.

    Defense attorneys, however, claim they were merely lost at sea and trying to get the ship’s attention.

    A jury trial for five of the

    men started Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Norfolk.

    In opening statements Wednesday, prosecutors said the men set out to hijack a ship in the Gulf of Aden and hold its crew for ransom. Under cover of night, they snuck up behind the Ashland thinking it was a commercial vessel, said attorney Benjamin Lucas Hatch.

    Before dawn, one of the men pulled out a gun and started firing. “They didn’t mean to attack the U.S. Navy, but that is exactly what they did,” Hatch said.

    Defense attorneys acknowledged one of the men on the boat fired a gun but argued they were only trying to get the sailors’ attention. Robert Rigney, one of the Somalis’ court-appointed attorneys, said the men were on their way back from smuggling a group of 80 refugees to Yemen when their ship became disabled.

    “It’s not unusual to fire a weapon to signal someone,” Rigney said. It would make no sense for pirates to attack a Navy ship. “These guys in a little skiff are going to take over the USS Ashland?” asked Rigney. “I’m not sure the National Enquirer magazine would buy this script.”

    If convicted of the piracy charges, the men face mandatory life sentences.

    Read the full article here.


  8. Talks heat up on downtown Norfolk conference center

    February 4, 2013 by Christy

    A Waterside Live deal that has seemed all but complete for months may now happen in tandem with a hotel-conference center project developed by Bruce Thompson of

    that have been demolished. Currently, this is the site of an urban park called The Plot.

    City officials see a symbiotic relationship between Waterside Live and the hotel-conference center. Several on the council said they expected both deals to be wrapped up by the spring.

    “Waterside will not survive without the conference center, and the conference center will not survive without Waterside,” Councilman Andy Protogyrou said. “It”s a relationship that allows them to feed off each other.”

    The letter of intent for Waterside created a framework for a 50-year lease agreement with Cordish, which says it can turn Waterside into a regional entertainment destination and create 1,000 jobs for Norfolk.

    Under the proposed agreement, Cordish would recoup up to 80 percent of its $28 million investment over 15 years by sharing tax revenue with the city.

    Jones said in November that the final agreement could be signed by the end of the year. This week, Jones said through a spokeswoman that “there is not a deadline to complete the Cordish agreement. We will announce once the agreement is finalized on both sides.”

    Read the full article here.


  9. Spending money on Norfolk’s future

    by Christy

    It makes sense for Norfolk to buy blighted properties to tear them down, especially in Denby Park and Ocean View.

    One decrepit shopping center at Wards Corner, just blocks from Denby Park, has been razed to make way for a more upscale shopping plaza, with a private investment of $18 million. Across the street, $1.2 million in renovations at the Midtown Shopping Center have given it a much-needed face lift.

    By acquiring dated and ramshackle apartments that front blocks on East Little Creek Road and Fort Worth Avenue, Norfolk improves its chances for continuing the changes at Wards Corner and boosting growth along the corridor between Granby Street and the thriving Wal-Mart shopping center at Tidewater Drive.

    With the acquisition of 37 apartments on seven properties, Norfolk has boosted the number it has acquired for demolition in Denby Park to 105.

    Councilman Andy Protogyrou said changes in the neighborhood will take time. But he promised the city would not buy properties merely to sit on them.

    “We’re looking to be able clean out the property from ills we’ve had in the past, from poor planning, from buildings that unfortunately fostered a sense of insecurity for residents,” he said. “We’re following what the plan is. It is a strong, viable community. But it’s also going to be a strong, viable commercial corridor.”

    It will be again, finally, with the city’s commitment.

    It’s an example of city purchases that benefit residents in several ways: removing blight, lowering crime, and improving the development viability of adjacent areas.

    The purchases are smart investments in the future of two of Norfolk’s most vital neighborhoods.

    Read the full article here.


  10. Traffic Court DUI Trials

    February 1, 2013 by Christy

    This past week Andrew preliminary breath test nor intoxilizer reading, the Court found there was no proof beyond a reasonable doubt and dismissed the case.

    All case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. These prior case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.